Saturday, September 22, 2007

ID 319 - To Sustain the Decision of the SC Regarding Proposal 316 - GPAX PPS - in Voting Queue

OK, let's see if this blog thing is going to work.

http://gp.org/cgi-bin/vote/propdetail?pid=319

4 comments:

Andy Exley said...

I tried to skim all of these proposals... this one is a proposal to confirm the GPUS SC's decision about another proposal. The other proposal was to define a mission statement for the Green Peace Action Committee (GPAX).
Right?

Sounds okay to me.

Anonymous said...

I read this proposal the same. It looks like a vote on whether the GPAX mission statement should remain in the voting queue. I like the idea of GPAX, but I haven't a clue whether this is a good mission statement or why there's a vote on whether to keep it in the queue.

This needs context.

Tom Cleland said...

I think it's great you have this blog. Sorry I haven't been keeping up on the GP proposals. There might be a way to make the URL to the GP voting details page into a "hot link". In blogger there's an icon for verifying the link. Also, just hitting "Enter" after pasting in the URL might be sufficient...

Tom Cleland said...

Any new votes lately? As a PCSC Rep I just forwarded a proposal to the state coordinating committee and discussion list for feedback. (The PCSC is the Presidential Campaign Support Committee for the Green Party of the United States.)